France demonstrations: Exercises in democracy?

The power struggle between religion and state continues in France, with Catholic clergymen and others inciting homophobic hatred and leading people in protest demonstrations calling for the oppression of same-sex couples by denying them equal rights. These religious leaders still don’t get the message: not everyone believes in their superstitious, bigoted beliefs. The leaders still feel they have the right to impose their views on everyone else, and to dictate the parameters of love and family.

They don’t, of course, and they collectively resemble little more now than  a slain dragon in its death throes. They have already lost their battle, even if they are still permitted to demonstrate.

But is a march like the one in France yesterday — with more than 100,000  people being led by Cardinal Philippe Barbarin, the Catholic archbishop of Lyon, and Grand Mosque Rector Kamel Kabtane, according to Reuters — an exercise in democracy? That question came up for debate here yesterday in my post about France.

Personally, I don’t see it. I think they are exercises in hate, because they are trying to deny people equal rights. That alone should make the demonstrations illegal, in my view. But if further reason is needed, the potential for violence and gay-bashing — which happened in France last year during and as a result of clergy-led demonstrations — is enough for such demos to be deemed illegal.

I’m not saying that clergypeople should not be allowed to preach their hateful, superstitious views in church; that is their turf, after all. But the streets are public domain and should not be used as forums to call for the enforcement of their oppressive and exclusionary belief systems.

It is time for France to ban such exercises in hate. Keep it off the streets.

For discussion.


One thought on “France demonstrations: Exercises in democracy?

  1. Organised religion has always set itself up to stand in judgement of those that don’t conform to what they see as societal norms. Why what consenting adults decide to do in private should be any concern of theirs I do not know. But they claim a “god” – made in their own image – as an excuse to poke their noses in where they are not wanted. Unfortunately such medieval attitudes still prevail with those that find it exciting to be judgemental (irrespective of what the Bible says about “judge not, lest you be judged”). Scratch the surface with these folk and you soon find plenty of corruption, such as the paedophilia within the Roman Catholic clergy that the RC church has attempted to cover up. It only goes to show that these folk are as fallible as the rest of us, and have no right to claim superiority over anyone.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s