ISIS: An eye for an eye?

In a retaliation for the barbaric murder of a Jordanian pilot by ISIS terrorists on Tuesday, the tiny nation hanged two militants it had been holding, including a woman, reports are saying. And the country seems intent on executing more ISIS and Al-Qaeda prisoners to avenge the death of their countryman.

Few observers can blame them, and I’m betting a lot of people are cheering Jordan’s actions. But I don’t think you would ever see nations like the United States and the U.K. openly support that sort of thing. Indeed, some reports I am seeing are suggesting that Jordan’s actions may fuel even more barbaric acts by ISIS and Al-Qaeda, and the circle could get more and more vicious.

What do you think of Jordan’s approach to this? Do you think other nations — including the West — should respond the same way: an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth? Should all ISIS and Al-Qaeda prisoners be hanged or burned to death or beheaded without any sort of trial? Or should they be given fair trials and treated as war prisoners to be released after it is all over?

And do you think ISIS actually cares if its captured fighters are executed in such manner?

I know that many readers feel the West and its allies should never stoop to ISIS’ level, but the fact is, ISIS is being bombed into hell and before it is done, tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of ISIS supporters will have been killed. We, of course, justify it and cheer on our forces, but the deaths are no less horrific.

What makes a hanging death or a beheading any more terrible than bombing and artillery deaths? Executing terrorists eliminates the possibility that they will ever harm anyone again (in this life). I suspect that’s the same logic ISIS uses, no matter how perverse their methods: executing the Jordanian pilot eliminates the possibility he will ever drop a bomb on them again.

The killing game is dirty, now matter how you look at it. ISIS does not play by the rules of traditional warfare, and Jordan has now responded in kind. No doubt, other other nations will follow suit.

Thoughts?

— Jillian

7 thoughts on “ISIS: An eye for an eye?

  1. Said before. “Violence begets violence” I think we called it escalation at one point. I believe the new term is “degrade”. So what are we supposed to do? Get the Nukes ready? No, Obama is right. Get the Arab tribes to also deal with this “tribal” conflict because if US and Nato troops get more involved it will get “really” messy. Not to mention $$$. The West can’t afford it right now. Got to play this smarter. What? We have a lot of new neat toys. Haven’t you heard of the electro-magnetic gun that shoots a shell for 25K$ instead of a Cruise missle @ 2M$ a pop? Not to mention the 6M$ Man soldier stuff? Doesn’t man’s genius astound you? It does me. And then there is mother Russia and Vlad.. These are Dark Days in Monkey City. Whatever happened to “make love not war” 😦

    Like

      1. I think it got lost somewhere in the ‘rape & pillage’ of human history. Age of Aquarius indeed. The sun is not shining today. Time for another hot-buttered rum %@

        Like

      2. I hate to rain on the party but I don’t think Haight-Ashbury is going to come back any time soon. Why?

        1. Cell-phones+Youtube
        2. Too many guns. At least in America

        But in a perverse sort of way, Je suis Charlie got 1M people out in the Champ-Elysées courtesy of you know who. Love & Hate are too closely related. It brings out either the best or the worst in us. But we know this. Or do we? Sweet dreams %P

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s