Wine labels: Accurate?

Would you buy a bottle of wine you’ve never tried before that has the word “Cupcake” on the label?

I did. It’s called Red Velvet, a 2012 California wine produced by Cupcake Vineyards. As with so many wines, it has a beautiful and enticing label — this one predominantly red, of course. And the description on the back label is no less enticing, with such phrases as a “heady nose of chocolate, deep rich blackberries, red fruits and a creamy mocha finish.”

Red Velvet's descriptive wine label by Cupcake Vineyards.
Red Velvet’s descriptive wine label by Cupcake Vineyards.

Yumm . . . My tastebuds are going wild already, and I haven’t opened the bottle yet. I’ll be drinking it tomorrow night with my g/f and a friend, and I am hoping it lives up to what the label promises.

Indeed, when we buy particular wines for the first time, we often have little to go on, unless we have read a review by a wine critic. We pretty much have to rely on the label’s description.

So, in this year of California wines — in which I have determined to sample as many as possible from that beautiful state — I am focusing on wines that at the very least provide some sort of summary on the label. Sadly, some vineyards don’t bother to give taste previews on the label — so I am avoiding them because my experience with that sort has been disappointing, as if the companies producing them are saying: “If you don’t have something good to say, say nothing at all.”

Of the vineyards that do take the time to describe the flavours you will taste when you drink their products, I am finding the descriptions to be pretty accurate. For example, Revolution Red is described as having bold flavours, and indeed, they are bold. It’s one of my fave California wines, right behind Barefoot Shiraz in my top 10.

So, I have high hopes for Cupcake’s Red Velvet. It cost almost $16 at the SAQ (a provincial government-sponsored liquor commission outlet), which is almost $5 more than the Barefoot.

But I have also learned that higher prices don’t always mean a better product. My g/f brought over a bottle of French wine recently that cost her in the mid-$20 range, and it was awful — like a weak cherry drink. And the winemaker didn’t provide a description of it on the bottle . . .

How about you? Do you find that wines generally live up to their taste descriptions on the labels?

— Jillian

7 thoughts on “Wine labels: Accurate?

  1. I’m really a Beer person. But wine for me are the Bordeaux or Pinot Noir. With those I rarely get disappointed. I wonder who will end up with Robin Williams vineyard though? Now that’s a California I relate to 😉

    Like

    1. I was never able to acquire a taste for beer. I always found it bitter. But the local supermarket, Metro, has a lot of specialty beers that — on the labels — look interesting.

      As for the Robin Williams vineyard estate, it does look like a lovely property. At $30 million, I’m surprised it didn’t sell quickly.

      Let’s see now: if you and I buy it as a joint venture, it would only cost us $15 million apiece. Are you in?

      Like

      1. lol – If I win the Loto I’ll make you an offer. Good thing is he didn’t end his journey there. Still going for that Mead party though 😉 PS. Careful with the beer tasting. It’ll grow on you. And then you’re in trouble. If you think wine has you just wait until you see establishments with 200 labels on the menu }D

        Like

  2. The descriptive comments have little meaning. It is something they make up, much like the snazzy labels, to seem impressive. You can make up your own. If it seems to match the description of ‘bold sweaty saddle blankets’ or whatever, some of that is power of suggestion. (BTW, I’m equally unimpressed with what a lot of ‘experts’ say to describe paintings and such.)

    Key points: wine comes in red and white, you like it or you don’t.

    Skol!

    Like

  3. Californian wines! Yum!

    My wife and I had a day touring and tasting in Napa Valley back in 1996. They were all good but the best were from the smaller vineyards. The wine we liked best (and brought a bottle home to to have with Christmas dinner) was from the Robert Sinsky Vineyard. That was a “claret” style red which was a blend of grape types. The best white was a chardonnay from Cuvaison Estate Wines.

    We also get treated to some Santa Cruz Mountains vineyard wines by my brother-in-law and his wife that live in the vicinity: Bonny Doon Vineyard and Bargetto Winery.

    As for wine labels: Even when they have descriptions on them I often can’t match what I taste to what they describe.

    A red I have enjoyed recently is South African rather than Californian: An organic red from a winery called Org de Rac. I got in a 3l box from Systembolaget in Malmo that is 65% Shiraz, 25% Cabernet Sauvignon, 10% Merlot. (Availabe in bottles, too.) You might find that in Ottawa.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s