A new term (for me, at least) has emerged in the aftermath of the horrific train disaster in Quebec last Saturday that decimated the town of Lac-Mégantic and left up to 60 people dead or missing (and thought to be dead). The term is “one-man crew.” That’s how many people have been manning some freight trains. Apart from being a somewhat questionable term grammatically speaking — the word “crew” usually means more than one — it is even more questionable to have only one engineer running a train. I mean, what if that sole engineer were to have a heart attack or something? Isn’t that one of the reasons why passenger airlines usually have a pilot AND a co-pilot?
It is too early to assign blame for the tragedy in Quebec, though the company that owns the train is now pointing a finger at the engineer, who has been suspended without pay. But even if the engineer did make a mistake, perhaps a co-engineer would have caught it.
People DO make mistakes. We are all human, after all. We should never leave the responsibility of running something as large as a freight train or a passenger train to one person. It seems so obvious that I wonder how anybody could ever have thought a “one-man crew” system would be safe. What were they thinking?
Meanwhile, Quebec Premier Pauline Marois has decreed that Quebec flags will fly at half-staff for a week, starting Thursday. It will also fly at half-staff in this blog.
I pray that the rail industry will learn from this tragedy, and will move to make sure it can never happen again.
Jillian
Love to all from the United States of America to our brothers and sisters up north
LikeLike